Top 5 LLM Gateways in 2025: The Complete Guide to Choosing the Best AI Gateway

Running multiple LLMs in production is complex. You need to manage different API formats, handle provider outages, optimize costs, and monitor performance—all while keeping latency low.
Fortunately, LLM Gateways (or LLM routers) can help solve these problems, acting as intelligent gateways between your application and AI providers and becoming a must-have for anyone building production-scale AI applications.
This guide evaluates the top 5 LLM Gateways available today, with a focus on real-world utility and production readiness.
Let's dive in!
TL;DR
Here's a quick overview of the top 5 LLM Gateways:
Router | Strengths | Weaknesses | Best For |
---|---|---|---|
Helicone AI Gateway | • Built with Rust (blazingly fast) • Health and rate-limit aware load-balancing • Seamless integration with Helicone for robust observability • Open-source (free to use) • Distributed rate limiting | • No pass-through billing | • High-scale AI applications needing reliability, speed and cost optimization |
OpenRouter | • Easy setup • Passthrough billing • Good for non-technical users | • 5% markup on requests • No self-hosting • No custom models | • Quick prototyping for small projects |
Portkey | • Rich enterprise features • Advanced guardrails | • Steep learning curve • Limited scalability and reliability • No pass-through billing | • Development teams needing detailed control and enterprise security |
LiteLLM | • Good customization • Strong community • Strong feature set | • Limited scalability (Each request adds > 50ms latency and is resource intensive) • Highly technical setup with a steep learning curve • No pass-through billing | • Engineering teams building custom LLM infrastructure |
Unify AI | • Simple and straightforward • Good for basic needs • Pass-through billing | • No load-balancing • Limited production scale | • Small projects with basic provider switching needs |
Table of Contents
- Why You Need an LLM Gateway
- How to Choose the Best LLM Router
- Top 5 LLM Gateways: In-Depth Comparison
- 1.Helicone AI Gateway
- 2. OpenRouter
- 3. Portkey
- 4. LiteLLM
- 5. Unify AI
- Which LLM Router is Best for You?
- Conclusion
Why You Need an LLM Gateway
Integrating LLMs via direct API calls seems simple until you hit production and start to scale. Here are some things that could go wrong:
-
Provider Lock-in: Your codebase becomes tightly coupled to a given provider's API format. Switching to a different provider means rewriting everything.
-
No Redundancy: When your provider goes down (and they all do), your application goes down with it.
-
Cost Blindness: You discover your AI spend only when the monthly bill arrives. By then, it's too late.
-
Performance Guesswork: You don't know which provider is fastest for your use case, or how to optimize routing.
LLM routers abstract these complexities behind a unified interface while adding intelligent routing, automatic failovers, and real-time observability.
How to Choose the Best LLM Router
Here are five key things to consider when selecting the best LLM router:
- Core Functionality: How well does it route requests, unify APIs, and handle deployments?
- Optimization: What cost-saving features, caching mechanisms, and performance tools does it offer?
- Integration: How easy is setup? What frameworks are supported? How customizable is it?
- Reliability: Does it provide monitoring, load-balancing, and failover capabilities?
- Scalability: How easy is it to scale as your application grows?
Top 5 LLM Gateways: In-Depth Comparison
Scroll to see the full table —>
Feature | Helicone AI Gateway | OpenRouter | Portkey | LiteLLM | Unify AI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing Strategy | Latency, weighted, cost-aware, use-case dependent; All health-aware | Latency, cost-aware, weighted, tag-based; health-aware | Cost-aware, weighted, region-aware; | latency, cost, weighted, least-busy; | Quality, latency, cost, constraint-based |
Pricing | Free | Free: Limited models Pay-as-you-go: 5% markup | Developers: Free Production: $49/mo Enterprise: Custom | Free (self-hosted) Enterprise: Custom | Personal: Free Professional: $40/seat/mo Enterprise: Custom |
Language & Runtime | Rust (super fast) | Python/TypeScript | Python | Python/TypeScript | Python |
Supported Providers | 100+ models and 25+ providers inluding OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Bedrock, etc. Custom models | 400+ models and providers | 100+ models | All major + custom | All major + custom |
Deployment Options | Docker, Kubernetes, self-hosted, cloud-managed | Cloud-managed only (SaaS) | Docker, Kubernetes, self-hosted, cloud-managed | Docker, Kubernetes, self-hosted only | Cloud-managed, self-hosted |
Unified API | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Caching | In-memory & Redis-based caching with intelligent strategies and scopes | Provider-native (varies by provider) | Built-in Simple & Semantic caching | In-memory & Redis | Client-side file-based with per-query control |
Fallbacks | Automatic retries and switching with health monitoring | Automatic provider switching | Automatic, with error-based triggering | Advanced, with cooldowns | Automatic multi-level fallbacks |
Rate Limiting | Flexible limits (global, router-level, request, token, cost) by user/team/provider; Health-aware | Global limits by API key; fixed RPM/RPD quotas | Flexible limits (request, token, cost) | Flexible global limits(cost, tag-based, model-specific) per user/team/key | Provider based |
LLM Observability & Monitoring Capabilities | Seamless integration with Helicone and OpenTelemetry | Activity logs only | Integration with Portkey | 15+ native integrations (Helicone, Langfuse, etc.) | Custom logging & visualizations (DIY) |
Load-Balancing | Latency, regional & weighted with automatic health monitoring. Rate-limit aware. | Price-weighted, latency, throughput, or order | Request distribution | Latency-based, weighted, least-busy, cost-based | ❌ |
Estimated Setup Time | <5 minutes | <5 minutes | <5 minutes | ⛔ 15-30 minutes | ⛔ 5-10 minutes |
Setup Difficulty | Easy | Easy | Easy | ⛔ Technical | Easy |
Open Source | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
Security Features | SOC2/HIPAA/GDPR, prompt injection protection, SSO, audit trails | Basic API security, DDoS protection | SOC2/HIPAA/GDPR, advanced guardrails, SSO, virtual keys | DIY security, community audits, virtual keys | Basic API authentication only |
Let's now take a look at each router in detail.
1.Helicone AI Gateway
The Helicone AI Gateway is one of the few LLM routers written in the highly performant Rust programming language.
It provides ultra-fast performance (e.g., 8ms P50 latency) and is horizontally scalable. It also features a single binary deployment, making it simple to run on AWS, GCP, Azure, on-prem, Kubernetes, Docker, or bare metal.
It also integrates seamlessly with Helicone's observability tools, providing real-time insights into provider performance and usage patterns.
Standout Features
- Speed: Built with Rust making it lightweight and super fast.
- Latency + PeakEWMA Load-Balancing: Tracks real-time latency and load across providers using moving averages. Routes to the fastest available provider for up to 40% latency reduction.
- Built-in Observability: Native cost tracking, latency metrics, and error monitoring with Helicone's LLM Observability tools and OpenTelemetry integrations. Real-time dashboards show provider performance and usage patterns.
- Intelligent Caching: Redis-based caching with configurable TTL reduces costs by up to 95%. Cross-provider compatibility—cache OpenAI responses, serve for Anthropic requests.
- Multi-Level Rate Limiting: Granular controls across users, teams, providers, and global limits. Distributed enforcement prevents quota overruns in multi-instance deployments.
- Health-Aware Routing: Automatic provider health monitoring with circuit breaking. Removes failing providers and tests for recovery without manual intervention.
- Regional Load-Balancing: Routes to nearest provider regions automatically for global applications.
Pros & Cons
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Features the most sophisticated load-balancing algorithms with automatic health monitoring | No pass-through billing |
Built with Rust which makes it lightweight and very fast | Not very suitable for non-technical users |
Free to use & open-source with flexible self-hosting options | |
Distributed rate limiting prevents cascading failures | |
Cross-provider caching maximizes cost savings | |
Seamless Helicone integration for comprehensive LLM observability |
Getting Started with Helicone AI Gateway
Here's how to migrate from direct API calls to AI Gateway in minutes:
Run container, adding necessary API keys
docker run -d --name helix \
-p 8080:8080 \
-e OPENAI_API_KEY=your_openai_key \
-e ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your_anthropic_key \
helicone/helix:latest
Use any model via the OpenAI SDK
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="http://localhost:8080/ai",
api_key="sk--xxxx" # Dummy key, gateway manages auth
)
# Route to any provider through the same interface, we handle the rest.
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="anthropic/claude-3-5-sonnet", # Or openai/gpt-4o, gemini/gemini-2.5-pro, etc.
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello from Helix!"}]
)
And that's it!
Improve App Reliability with Helicone AI Gateway ⚡️
Protect your AI applications from outages and reduce costs with AI Gateway. Multiple deployment options, including self-hosting, and seamless integration with Helicone.
2. OpenRouter
OpenRouter provides a unified API that gives you access to hundreds of AI models through a single endpoint, while automatically handling fallbacks and selecting the most cost-effective options.
It focuses on providing a simple, user-friendly interface for non-technical users than robust features for production-scale applications.
Standout Features
- User-Friendly Interface: Web UI allows direct interaction without coding
- Extensive Model Support: Access to hundreds of models through a unified API
- Pass-through billing: Centralized billing for all providers
- Automatic Fallbacks: Seamlessly switches providers during outages
- Quick Setup: <5 minutes from signup to first request
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Easy setup | 5% markup on all requests adds to costs |
Great for prototyping and experimentation | Limited observability and monitoring capabilities |
Free tier available with pay-as-you-go option | Fallbacks are static, not adaptive—models and providers are tried in fixed order, without real-time performance optimization |
Supports both technical and non-technical users | No self-hosting option (not open-source) |
Caching varies by provider with different requirements |
Best For: Teams wanting immediate access to multiple LLMs without complex setup, especially when non-technical stakeholders need direct access.
3. Portkey
Portkey's AI Gateway is a comprehensive platform designed to streamline and enhance AI integration for developers and organizations.
Built on top of Portkey—an observability tool, it serves as a unified interface for interacting with over 100 AI models, offering advanced tools for control, visibility, and security in your Generative AI apps.
Standout Features
-
Advanced Guardrails: Enforce content policies and output controls
-
Virtual Key Management: Secure API key handling for teams
-
Configurable Routing: Automatic retries, fallbacks with exponential backoff
-
Prompt Management: Built-in tools for prompt versioning and testing
-
Enterprise Features: Compliance controls, audit trails, and SSO support
-
Observability: Detailed analytics, custom metadata, and alerting
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Rich feature set for complex requirements | $49/month starting price may deter small teams |
Good documentation and onboarding flow | Learning curve for advanced features |
Strong security and compliance features (SOC2, GDPR, HIPAA) | |
Supports multiple routing strategies | |
Simple and semantic caching | |
Can be easily integrated in two lines of code |
Best For: Development teams needing detailed control over routing behavior and enterprise-grade security features.
4. LiteLLM
LiteLLM is an LLM router that focuses on flexibility, offering a unified interface across 100+ LLM providers with completely free, open-source access.
It excels at advanced routing algorithms and comprehensive team management through highly customizable configurations.
Standout Features
- Advanced Routing Strategies: Latency-based, usage-based, cost-based routing with customizable algorithms
- Comprehensive Load-Balancing: Multiple algorithms including least-busy, latency-based, and usage-based with Kubernetes scaling
- Team Management: Virtual keys, budget controls, tag-based routing, and team-level spend tracking
- Production Features: Pre-call checks, cooldowns for failed deployments, alerting via Slack/email, and 15+ observability integrations
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Completely free and open-source | 15–30 minute technical setup |
Extensive provider support (100+) | Requires Python expertise and YAML configuration |
Advanced routing algorithms | All features require manual configuration |
Robust retry logic and fallbacks | Steep learning curve for advanced features |
Comprehensive team and budget management | Additional setup overhead due to Redis caching |
Strong community support |
Best For: Engineering teams building production LLM infrastructure who need maximum control, extensive provider support, and advanced routing capabilities.
5. Unify AI
Unify.AI is a highly customizable LLMOps platform that prioritizes simplicity and customization over complexity.
It's designed for developers who want to build custom interfaces for logging, evaluations, guardrails, and other LLM operations without the overhead of advanced features.
Standout Features
- Simple Interface: Clean UI for basic routing needs
- Provider-Level Routing: Route between different AI providers
- Basic Caching: Simple response caching to reduce costs
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Medium difficulty setup (5–10 minutes) | No load-balancing capabilities |
Free tier available with pay-as-you-go pricing | Missing advanced features (custom rate limiting, observability) |
Simple and straightforward | Not suitable for production scale |
Good for basic use cases |
Best For: Small projects or teams with basic routing needs who only need to switch between providers, not specific models.
Which LLM Router is Best for You?
Use Case | Requirements | Recommended Router |
---|---|---|
High-Scale Production | Distributed rate limiting, health-aware load-balancing, native observability | Helicone's AI Gateway |
Quick Prototyping | Minimal setup with a friendly UI | OpenRouter |
Maximum Control | Open-source preference, comfortable with configuration | Helicone AI Gateway or LiteLLM (both open-source) |
Enterprise Requirements | Advanced guardrails and compliance features | Helicone AI Gateway or Portkey |
Basic Routing | Simple provider switching | Unify.AI |
Break up with your LLM Provider Today 💔
Why stick to a single provider when you can get the best of them all? Get started with Helicone AI Gateway in minutes.
Conclusion
LLM gateways are becoming essential infrastructure for production AI applications. While all five options solve basic routing needs, they differ significantly in sophistication and capabilities.
Helicone AI Gateway provides a robust set of production-grade features like latency load-balancing and built-in observability. OpenRouter excels at simplicity. Portkey offers enterprise controls. LiteLLM provides open-source flexibility. Unify.AI covers basic needs.
This guide should serve as a good starting point for your decision-making process. Good luck!
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an LLM gateway and why do I need one?
An LLM gateway (or LLM router) acts as an intelligent gateway between your application and multiple AI providers. It handles API format differences, manages failovers during provider outages, optimizes costs through smart routing, and provides monitoring capabilities. Without one, you're stuck with provider lock-in, no redundancy when services go down, and blind spots in your AI spending.
How does Helicone AI Gateway compare to using providers directly?
Helicone AI Gateway adds a thin layer that provides automatic failover, load-balancing, caching (up to 95% cost savings), and comprehensive observability. Direct provider integration means rewriting code when switching providers, no backup during outages, and limited visibility into performance and costs. The Gateway adds minimal latency (~50ms) while providing significant reliability and cost benefits.
Which LLM router is best for production use?
For production environments, Helicone AI Gateway and LiteLLM are the strongest options. Helicone excels with its Rust-based performance, sophisticated load-balancing algorithms, and native observability integration. LiteLLM offers maximum customization but requires more technical setup. OpenRouter and Portkey work well for specific use cases, while Unify AI is better suited for basic routing needs.
How much does it cost to use an LLM gateway?
Pricing varies significantly. Helicone AI Gateway and LiteLLM are open-source and free to self-host. OpenRouter adds a 5% markup on all requests. Portkey starts at $49/month. Unify AI offers a free tier with pay-as-you-go pricing. Consider both the router costs and potential savings from features like caching and intelligent routing when evaluating total cost.
How difficult is it to set up an LLM gateway?
Setup difficulty varies by router. OpenRouter, Helicone AI Gateway, and Portkey can be configured in under 5 minutes with simple API changes. LiteLLM requires 15-30 minutes of technical setup including YAML configuration. Unify AI takes 5-10 minutes. All routers provide documentation, but technical complexity increases with advanced features like custom routing algorithms or distributed deployments.
What happens when an LLM provider goes down?
Quality routers handle provider failures automatically. Helicone AI Gateway uses health-aware routing with circuit breaking to detect failures and route to healthy providers. OpenRouter and Portkey offer automatic fallbacks to backup providers. LiteLLM provides advanced retry logic with configurable cooldowns. Without a router, your application fails when your provider fails.
Do LLM gateways add latency to requests?
Yes, but it's minimal and often offset by performance improvements. Helicone AI Gateway (built with Rust) adds ~50ms latency. Other routers add 50-200ms depending on features enabled. However, intelligent routing often reduces overall latency by selecting faster providers, and caching can eliminate latency entirely for repeated requests. The reliability benefits typically outweigh the small latency cost.
Questions or feedback?
Are the information out of date? Please raise an issue or contact us, we'd love to hear from you!